have been turn! into a tool for revenge by acting out of feelings of spite and hatr!. Did someone do something we didn’t like, did someone get into a position we covet!? We thought it was a feat to choose to damage the reputations of people who bother! us and who held positions we covet!. We have made it ordinary to act out of our delusions and to undermine the reputations of those who came to power, and to damage the reputations of those who did things we didn’t like. The digital world has made it so easy to adopt the sick mentality that if the mud doesn’t stick, the scars will remain, that the digital world that offers opportunities has suddenly become a threat that houses an army of digital killers.
Of course those who attempt digital murder
are primarily responsible and guilty in the creation of this threat. So, is our attitude towards individuals injur! by the slander and false bullets fir! by these digital uruguay whatsapp number data 5 million murderers so innocent? Is the digital world innocent? Are digital serial killers who use digital environments as assassination weapons for their dirty purposes and the platforms that host them innocent? No, never innocent. So who or what is guilty and responsible?
Those who remain silent and indifferent
in the face of the destruction caus! by the lies and slander of digital serial killers are responsible. Those who act in the “may the snake that doesn’t touch me live a thousand years” mode are responsible.
Those who lynch people who are fac! with this unpleasant situation without considering the possibility that what digital killers put forward may be lies and slander, rules for effective partnership in the legal profession regardless of the possibility that they may be innocent, are responsible and guilty.
Those who help destroy people’s reputations with germany cell number the sick understanding that there is no smoke without fire, bas! on a post they see or read on the internet, are responsible and guilty.
Those who act with prejudice against people, who do not empathize, and who murder the presumption of innocence bas! on false news on the internet and social m!ia are responsible and guilty.
Platform owners are also responsible and guilty for providing space and opportunities for digital murderers, for not showing the reaction that should have been shown, and for remaining insensitive to the demands of individuals and countries by putting forward the nonsense of fre!om of expression.
